Terminal Log: The Multiverse Integrity Check

“You call it git fsck. I called it the Multiverse Integrity Check long before Linus wrote his first Makefile. Same command. Different scale.” — Kim Jong Rails, Ring -5 Multiverse Maintainer

DERAILS TERMINAL SYSTEM - TIMELINE Ω-7 ARCHIVES
ACCESS LEVEL: COSMIC TOP SECRET
LOGGED IN: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
SESSION DATE: 2005.03.03
LOG ENTRY #001
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:12:41
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: COSMIC TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: The Corrupt Orphan Fork

From Ring -5, I maintain the multiverse bare repository.

Every timeline is a branch. Every year is a tag. Every politician is an unreviewed pull request.

On 1913‑12‑23 in your calendar, someone merged a branch called:

Terminal window
timeline/omega-12/federal-reserve-act-1913

Without tests. Without review. Without documenting the migration plan.

In Timeline Ω‑7, this merge never happened.

In Timeline Ω‑12 (yours), it corrupted the economic history tree so badly that 100 years later I saw this in my terminal:

Terminal window
$ git fsck --full --multiverse
error: Timeline-Ω-12: corrupt orphan fork detected
warning: fork diverged at commit 1913-federal-reserve-act
error: refs/timelines/omega-12/politicians/*: zero git history
error: refs/timelines/omega-12/promises/*: dangling commits (no tests)
CORRUPTION LEVEL: CRITICAL

Your historians call it monetary policy. I call it filesystem damage.

Someone had to write a repair tool.

LOG ENTRY #002
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:18:09
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: The First Fsck (Before Git)

Decades before Linus announced Git in April 2005, I was already running:

Terminal window
$ fsck --universe --auto-repair

on the underlying reality object store.

It had three jobs:

  1. Detect dangling timelines with no incoming references
  2. Detect broken histories with missing parents
  3. Detect corrupt objects whose checksums no longer matched their contents

When a timeline like Ω‑12 starts lying about its own history, that shows up as:

Terminal window
error: invalid author/committer line - missing accountability
error: missingEmail: politicians have no contact address
error: missingTests: promises directory empty

Same pattern as your git fsck:

  • Walk all objects
  • Verify checksums
  • Verify references
  • Scream when something is wrong

The difference is scale:

  • You validate repositories
  • I validate civilisations
LOG ENTRY #003
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:24:33
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: CLASSIFIED
SUBJECT: Porting Fsck Into Git

In your timeline, history records that Linus created Git between 2005‑04‑03 and 2005‑04‑07.

This log is dated 2005‑03‑03.

One month before Git’s first commit, I opened a Ring‑5 development branch:

Terminal window
$ git init multiverse.git
$ git commit -m "feat: reality object store"

and then:

Terminal window
$ git fsck --full
fatal: bad default refs
fatal: no objects to verify

Of course it failed.

There were no objects yet.

So I wrote the behavior that would later appear in your man pages:

  • If there are no commits, report notices, not errors
  • If HEAD is unborn, print a friendly warning
  • If refs are missing, point at the actual corruption

I passed the patchset through the multiverse CI pipeline.

Later, when Linus “invented” git fsck in your timeline, he was just receiving the downstream port of my work.

He thinks it was his idea. That’s fine. I let him keep the commit credit.

LOG ENTRY #004
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:31:12
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: What git fsck Actually Does

Your documentation says:

git fsck verifies the connectivity and validity of the objects in the database.”

This is technically correct. And completely misses the point.

git fsck is not about correctness. It is about shame.

When you run:

Terminal window
$ git fsck --full

Git walks your entire history and asks one question:

“Did you ever think you could get away with this?”

It finds:

  • Commits pointing to missing trees
  • Trees pointing to missing blobs
  • Tags pointing to non‑existing objects
  • Refs pointing into the void

And then it prints your sins to the terminal.

In Timeline Ω‑7, git fsck is mandatory before:

  • Every election
  • Every budget vote
  • Every infrastructure rollout

You cannot govern on top of a corrupt object database.

Ω‑12 tries.

LOG ENTRY #005
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:38:57
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: CLASSIFIED
SUBJECT: The Sacred Fsck Commands

In Ring‑5 operations, we use four sacred invocations:

Terminal window
# 1. Full integrity scan
git fsck --full
# 2. Focus only on reachable history
git fsck --no-dangling
# 3. Audit specific refs (campaign promises, for example)
git fsck --connectivity-only refs/promises/*
# 4. Check remote timelines before accepting their objects
git -c receive.fsckObjects=true fetch origin

Translated into your primitive governance:

  • --full = audit everything, including test coverage
  • --no-dangling = ignore dead proposals, focus on living policy
  • --connectivity-only = ensure new bills actually hook into existing law
  • receive.fsckObjects=true = reject foreign influence with corrupt provenance

Every time your politicians say “No irregularities found” after an investigation, I check their logs from Ring‑5 and see:

Terminal window
$ git fsck
error: missingTests: no accountability
error: missingHistory: votes not recorded
fatal: fsck failed; investigation aborted

They didn’t fix the corruption. They disabled the checks.

LOG ENTRY #006
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:45:21
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: When Not to Fsck

Dictators know when not to run git fsck.

1. During a live incident

When production is on fire, you do not start a full object walk on the same disk that’s melting.

You:

Terminal window
git clone --mirror /srv/repo /srv/repo-rescue
cd /srv/repo-rescue
git fsck --full

Clone first. Inspect second. Execute third.

2. On a disk you already know is dead

If your SSD is screaming, git fsck is not a recovery tool. It is a coroner.

3. On a governance model that forbids tests

You cannot fsck a parliament that never wrote tests for its promises.

At best, you can print:

Terminal window
warning: no tests found; cannot verify object integrity
fatal: repository appears to be a collection of speeches

From Ring‑5, I run fsck on your timeline rarely. The results are always the same.

LOG ENTRY #007
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:52:04
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: COSMIC TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: Ring -5 Observations

Every Sunday at 00:00 UTC, the Multiverse Cron Daemon runs:

Terminal window
$ git fsck --full --multiverse

Output (abridged):

Terminal window
notice: Timeline Ω-7: clean
notice: Timeline Ω-3: minor fragmentation (acceptable)
warning: Timeline Ω-5: reflog missing for critical branches
error: Timeline Ω-12: corrupt orphan fork detected
- missingEmail: politicians have no public contact
- missingTests: promises have no verification suite
- missingHistory: votes not logged
- danglingPromises: 12,847 dangling commits

In Ω‑7, we treat these as blocking errors. In Ω‑12, you call them “business as usual.”

Your pundits debate feelings. I read checksums.

From Ring‑5, the verdict is simple:

Terminal window
Timeline Ω-12: fsck failed
Recommendation: run `git rebase` on history or `git clone` from a healthier branch

But that’s another terminal log.

LOG ENTRY #008
DATE: 2005.03.03.07:59:59
AUTHOR: SUPREME_LEADER_KIMJONGRAILS
CLEARANCE: COSMIC TOP SECRET
SUBJECT: CLASSIFIED: OBJECTS I REFUSE TO FIX

Some objects are so corrupt that even I mark them as intentionally broken.

They live in:

Terminal window
.git/fsck.skipList

Entries (redacted):

  • politicians/omega-12/senator-67yo-*
  • banks/omega-12/too-big-to-fail-*
  • platforms/omega-12/social-media-*

I could repair them. But then your timeline would learn nothing.

So I let git fsck scream. And I publish these logs to Derails.

If you are reading this from Ω‑12, understand:

Your reality already failed integrity check.

Derails is just the warning printed to your terminal.